Imagen 1 de 6
![Foto genérica](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/kFMAAOSw1kxg3F5P/s-l640.jpg)
![Lente Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2,8G IF-ED - Imagen 1 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DH8AAOSwPmdhYRU7/s-l500.jpg)
![Lente Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2,8G IF-ED - Imagen 2 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/pDgAAOSwBhZhYRU8/s-l500.jpg)
![Lente Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2,8G IF-ED - Imagen 3 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/nnUAAOSwHJBhYRU9/s-l500.jpg)
![Lente Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2,8G IF-ED - Imagen 4 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/~~8AAOSwORFhYRVB/s-l500.jpg)
![Lente Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2,8G IF-ED - Imagen 5 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/yMUAAOSwfj5hYRU~/s-l500.jpg)
![Lente Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2,8G IF-ED - Imagen 6 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/8TsAAOSwJzFhYRVD/s-l500.jpg)
Imagen 1 de 6
![Foto genérica](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/kFMAAOSw1kxg3F5P/s-l640.jpg)
![Imagen 1 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DH8AAOSwPmdhYRU7/s-l1600.jpg)
![Imagen 2 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/pDgAAOSwBhZhYRU8/s-l1600.jpg)
![Imagen 3 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/nnUAAOSwHJBhYRU9/s-l1600.jpg)
![Imagen 4 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/~~8AAOSwORFhYRVB/s-l1600.jpg)
![Imagen 5 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/yMUAAOSwfj5hYRU~/s-l1600.jpg)
![Imagen 6 de 6](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/8TsAAOSwJzFhYRVD/s-l1600.jpg)
bon objectiu, (descatalogat?), de construcció excelent peró PESAT (uns 750 gr). L'autofocus grinyola quan enfoques a infinit o no acaba de trobar el focus (però això no te cap importància). En canvi no esperava trobar-me amb tanta ***distorsió geomètrica*** a focals 17 fins a 20 mm. En t'e m'es que un Nikon 12-24 f/4 que toinc per a una APS-C. Potser es tracta d'agafarli el punt. El millor és el ventall de focals que cibreix. El "KIng" 14-24 -a part de ser molt més car- és estrictament *gran angular*, però també és el millor. El dubte és si no m'hagues anat millor el 16-35 f/4 (menys distorsió?) o encara millor l'antic 20-35. ------------- It is a good lens, with excellent construction, but HEAVY (about 750 gr) It covers a very interesting wide angle from 17 mm to a normal-wide angle 35 mm, only similar with Nikon 16-35 (VR but f/4) and the old Nikon 20-35 (an excellent choice). The Nikon 14-24 is obviously the King, the better, but it is more expensive and it is wide angle exclusively. The autofocus squeak (does not matter), but the worst I believe it has an unexpected and excessive geometric distortion at 17 to 20 mm. Maybe I need to domain it still. Right now, I dude about the most wearable UGA Nikon for full frame ...Nikon 17-35 f/2.8...or Nikon 16-35 VR f/4 ....or maybe the best choice is the old Nikon 20-35. For extreme wide angle (or only wide angle), the King is the Nikon 14-24, just the best. Leer la opinión completa
Compra verificada: sí | Estado: Usado
Diapositiva actual {CURRENT_SLIDE} de {TOTAL_SLIDES}: Más vendidos en Objetivos