|En la categoría:
¿Quieres vender uno?

¿Quién debe juzgar? : El debate perenne sobre si elegir o nombrar...-

Texto original
Who Is to Judge? : The Perennial Debate over Whether to Elect or Appoint...
Estado:
En muy buen estado
Precio:
USD14,99
Aproximadamente13,86 EUR
Envío:
USD4,87 (aprox. 4,50 EUR) Envío Económico. Ver detallespara el envío
Ubicado en: Silver Spring, Maryland, Estados Unidos
Entrega:
Entrega prevista entre el lun. 3 jun. y el vie. 7 jun. a 43230
Calculamos el plazo de entrega con un método patentado que combina diversos factores, como la proximidad del comprador a la ubicación del artículo, el servicio de envío seleccionado, el historial de envíos del vendedor y otros datos. Los plazos de entrega pueden variar, especialmente en épocas de mucha actividad.
Devoluciones:
Pagos:
     

Compra con confianza

Garantía al cliente de eBay
Si no recibes el artículo que has pedido, te devolvemos el dinero. 

Información del vendedor

Registrado como vendedor particular, por lo que no se aplican los derechos de los consumidores derivados de la ley de protección de los consumidores de la UE. La Garantía al cliente de eBay sigue aplicando a la mayoría de las compras.Más informaciónRegistrado como vendedor particular
El vendedor asume toda la responsabilidad de este anuncio.
N.º de artículo de eBay:354550058364
Última actualización el 23 oct 2023 03:36:13 H.EspVer todas las actualizacionesVer todas las actualizaciones

Características del artículo

Estado
En muy buen estado: Libro que se ha leído y que no tiene un aspecto nuevo, pero que está en un ...
ISBN
9780190887148
Publication Year
2019
Type
Textbook
Format
Hardcover
Language
English
Publication Name
Who Is to Judge? : the Perennial Debate over Whether to Elect or Appoint America's Judges
Item Height
0.7in
Author
Charles Gardner Geyh
Item Length
6.3in
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
Item Width
9.7in
Item Weight
16.8 Oz
Number of Pages
216 Pages

Acerca de este producto

Product Information

An elected judiciary is virtually unique to the American experience and creates a paradox in a representative democracy. Elected judges take an oath to uphold the law impartially, which calls upon them to swear off the influence of the very constituencies they must cultivate in order to attain and retain judicial office. This paradox has given rise to perennially shrill and unproductive binary arguments over the merits and demerits of elected and appointed judiciaries, which this project seeks to transcend and reimagine. In Who Is to Judge?, judicial politics expert Charles Gardner Geyh exposes and explains the overstatements of both sides in the judicial selection debate. When those exaggerations are understood as such, it becomes possible to search for common ground and its limits. Ultimately, this search leads Geyh to conclude that, while appointive systems are a preferable default, no one system of selection is best for all jurisdictions at all times.

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0190887141
ISBN-13
9780190887148
eBay Product ID (ePID)
23038266089

Product Key Features

Author
Charles Gardner Geyh
Publication Name
Who Is to Judge? : the Perennial Debate over Whether to Elect or Appoint America's Judges
Format
Hardcover
Language
English
Publication Year
2019
Type
Textbook
Number of Pages
216 Pages

Dimensions

Item Length
6.3in
Item Height
0.7in
Item Width
9.7in
Item Weight
16.8 Oz

Additional Product Features

Lc Classification Number
Kf8776.G49 2019
Reviews
"Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who Is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's mostenduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges"Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who Is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Fewlegal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. SouersProfessor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis"Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state courtjudiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers andJudicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, "Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who Is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's most enduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges"Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who Is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Few legal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis"Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state court judiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, "Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who Is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's most enduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges "Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who Is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Few legal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis "Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state court judiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, "Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's most enduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges "Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Few legal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis "Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state court judiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's mostenduring debates.
Table of Content
Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: A Short and Pointed History of Judicial Selection Chapter 3: The New Judicial Selection Landscape Chapter 4: The Arguments Chapter 5: Why Everyone is Wrong Chapter 6: Managing the Selection Debate Chapter 7: The Future of Judicial Selection
Copyright Date
2019
Topic
General
Lccn
2018-031973
Dewey Decimal
347.73/14
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition
23
Genre
Law

Descripción del artículo del vendedor

zenaciss-0

zenaciss-0

100% de votos positivos
2 artículos vendidos
Suele responder en 24 horas
Registrado como vendedor particular
Por tanto, no se aplican los derechos de los consumidores derivados de las leyes de protección de los consumidores de la UE. La Garantía al cliente de eBay sigue aplicando a la mayoría de compras. Más informaciónMás información

Votos de vendedor (1)

m***m (1620)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.
Último año
Compra verificada
Thank you for fast shipping!

Valoraciones y opiniones del producto

Todavía no hay valoraciones ni opiniones
Sé el primero en escribir una opinión.