Imagen 1 de 1
Foto genérica
Imagen 1 de 1
Foto genérica
Justification of God : An Exegetical & Theological Study of Romans 9:1-23 by John Piper (1993, Trade Paperback)
grandeagleretail (956491)
98,6% de votos positivos
Precio:
USD27,89
Aproximadamente23,93 EUR
+ USD17,57 de envío
Devoluciones:
Estado:
A careful, reasoned study of the doctrine of election. Author John Piper. Format Paperback.
- ¡Cómpralo ya!The Justification of God An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 9:123: An
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Acerca de este artículo
Product Identifiers
PublisherBaker Academic
ISBN-100801070791
ISBN-139780801070792
eBay Product ID (ePID)971917
Product Key Features
Number of Pages246 Pages
Publication NameJustification of God : an Exegetical & Theological Study of Romans 9:1-23
LanguageEnglish
Publication Year1993
SubjectBiblical Studies / Exegesis & Hermeneutics, Biblical Studies / General, Biblical Criticism & Interpretation / New Testament
TypeTextbook
AuthorJohn Piper
Subject AreaReligion
FormatTrade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height0.7 in
Item Weight14.4 Oz
Item Length9 in
Item Width6 in
Additional Product Features
Edition Number2
Intended AudienceCollege Audience
LCCN82-074139
Reviews"Piper leads one through complex exegetical issues, engaging important literature fairly, summarizing the arguments frequently, and stating his conclusions (and warrants) clearly."--Leander Keck, Harvard University
TitleLeadingThe
SynopsisA careful, reasoned study of the doctrine of election. Piper dissects Paul's Greek and the argument it conveys to present the picture of God and his righteousness painted in Romans 9., John Piper presents a careful, reasoned study of the doctrine of election. He dissects Paul's argument to highlight the picture of God and his righteousness painted in Romans 9. Undergirded by his belief that the sovereignty of God is too precious a part of our faith to dismiss or approach weak-kneed, Piper explores the Greek text and Paul's argument with singular deftness.
