¿Quieres vender uno?

Socrates, Pleasure, and Value

Queen City Books
(12747)
Registrado como vendedor profesional
USD9,99
Aproximadamente8,75 EUR
Estado:
Como nuevo
Like new softcover.
¡Corre antes de que se agote! 1 usuario tiene este artículo en seguimiento.
Respira tranquilidad. Se aceptan devoluciones.
Envío:
USD3,98 (aprox. 3,49 EUR) USPS Media MailTM.
Ubicado en: Lynchburg, Ohio, Estados Unidos
Entrega:
Entrega prevista entre el mar. 5 ago. y el vie. 8 ago. a 94104
Calculamos el plazo de entrega con un método patentado que combina diversos factores, como la proximidad del comprador a la ubicación del artículo, el servicio de envío seleccionado, el historial de envíos del vendedor y otros datos. Los plazos de entrega pueden variar, especialmente en épocas de mucha actividad.
Devoluciones:
30 días para devoluciones. El comprador paga el envío de la devolución..
Pagos:
    Diners Club

Compra con confianza

Garantía al cliente de eBay
Si no recibes el artículo que has pedido, te devolvemos el dinero. Más informaciónGarantía al cliente de eBay - se abre en una nueva ventana o pestaña
El vendedor asume toda la responsabilidad de este anuncio.
N.º de artículo de eBay:284282732964
Última actualización el 09 ene 2025 17:56:32 H.EspVer todas las actualizacionesVer todas las actualizaciones

Características del artículo

Estado
Como nuevo
Libro en perfecto estado y poco leído. La tapa no tiene desperfectos y si procede, con sobrecubierta para las tapas duras. Incluye todas las páginas sin arrugas ni roturas. El texto no está subrayado ni resaltado de forma alguna, y no hay anotaciones en los márgenes. Puede presentar marcas de identificación mínimas en la contraportada o las guardas. Muy poco usado. Consulta el anuncio del vendedor para obtener más información y la descripción de cualquier posible imperfección. Ver todas las definiciones de estadose abre en una nueva ventana o pestaña
Notas del vendedor
“Like new softcover.”
ISBN
9780195159615

Acerca de este producto

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0195159616
ISBN-13
9780195159615
eBay Product ID (ePID)
2298618

Product Key Features

Book Title
Socrates, Pleasure, and Value
Number of Pages
192 Pages
Language
English
Topic
Ethics & Moral Philosophy, History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical, Emotions
Publication Year
2002
Illustrator
Yes
Genre
Philosophy, Psychology
Author
George Rudebusch
Format
Trade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height
0.3 in
Item Weight
10.9 Oz
Item Length
6.1 in
Item Width
9.1 in

Additional Product Features

Intended Audience
Trade
Reviews
"In this excellent book, Rudebusch pursues this question to the heart ofSocrates' ethics and concludes that Socrates is indeed a hedonist of an unusualkind....Every page of this extraordinary book offers spare but subtle argumentwithout embellishment or distraction--a model of philosophical writing.Certainly the best book on Socratic ethics. Strongly recommended for collegeand university libraries."--Choice, "In this excellent book, Rudebusch pursues this question to the heart of Socrates' ethics and concludes that Socrates is indeed a hedonist of an unusual kind....Every page of this extraordinary book offers spare but subtle argument without embellishment or distraction--a model of philosophicalwriting. Certainly the best book on Socratic ethics. Strongly recommended for college and university libraries."--Choice, "In this excellent book, Rudebusch pursues this question to the heart of Socrates' ethics and concludes that Socrates is indeed a hedonist of an unusual kind....Every page of this extraordinary book offers spare but subtle argument without embellishment or distraction--a model of philosophical writing. Certainly the best book on Socratic ethics. Strongly recommended for college and university libraries."--Choice, "In this excellent book, Rudebusch pursues this question to the heart of Socrates' ethics and concludes that Socrates is indeed a hedonist of an unusual kind....Every page of this extraordinary book offers spare but subtle argument without embellishment or distraction--a model of philosophical writing. Certainly the best book on Socratic ethics. Strongly recommended for college and university libraries."--Choice"In this excellent book, Rudebusch pursues this question to the heart of Socrates' ethics and concludes that Socrates is indeed a hedonist of an unusual kind....Every page of this extraordinary book offers spare but subtle argument without embellishment or distraction--a model of philosophical writing. Certainly the best book on Socratic ethics. Strongly recommended for college and university libraries."--Choice
Dewey Edition
21
Dewey Decimal
183/.2
Table Of Content
ONE. IntroductionTWO. Plato's Aporetic StyleTHREE. Ethical ProtagoreanismFOUR. Callicles' HedonismFIVE. Callicles RefutedSIX. Death Is One of Two ThingsSEVEN. The Intrinsic Value of Sense Pleasure and PainEIGHT. The Righteous Are HappyNINE. Does Socrates Conistently Hold the Sufficiency Thesis?TEN. How Socrates Can Make Both Pleasure and Virtue the Chief GoodNotesBibliographyIndex of PassagesGeneral Index
Synopsis
In the past quarter century, enormous philosophical attention has been paid to Plato's "Socratic" dialogues, as interpreters have sought to identify which dialogues are truly Socratic and interpret and defend the moral theories they find in those works. In spite of this intellectual energy, no consensus has emerged on the question of whether Socrates was a hedonist-whether he believed pleasure to be the good. In this study, George Rudebusch addresses this question and the textual puzzle from which it has arisen. In the Protagoras, Plato has Socrates appeal to hedonism in order to assert his characteristic identification of virtue and knowledge. While in the Gorgias, Socrates attributes hedonism to his opponent and argues against it in defence of his own view that doing injustice is worse than suffering it. From the Apology and Crito, it is clear that Socrates believes virtue to be the supreme good. Taken together, scholars have found these texts to be incoherent and seek to account for them either in terms of the development of Plato's thinking or by denying that one or more of these texts was meant to reflect Socrates' own ethical theory. Rudebusch argues instead that these texts do indeed fit together into a coherent moral theory as he attempts to locate Socrates' position on hedonism. He distinguishes Socrates' own hedonism from that which Socrates attacks elsewhere. Rudebusch also maintains that Socrates identifies pleasant activity with virtuous activity, describing Socrates' hedonism as one of activity, not sensation. This analysis allows for Socrates to find both virtue and pleasure to be the good, thus solving the textual puzzle and showing the power of Socratic argument in leading human beings toward the good. Tackling some of the most fundamental debates over Socratic ethics in Plato's earlier dialogues, Socrates, Pleasure, and Value will generate renewed discussion among specialists and provide excellent reading for courses in ancient philosophy as well as ethical theory., In this study, George Rudebusch addresses whether Socrates was a hedonist-whether he believed pleasure to be the good. In attempting to locate Socrates' position on hedonism, Rudebusch examines the passages in Plato's early dialogues that are the most disputed on the topic. He maintains that Socrates identifies pleasant activity with virtuous activity, describing Socrates' hedonism as one of activity, not sensation. This analysis allows for Socrates to find both virtue and pleasure to be the good, thus solving the textual puzzle and showing the power of Socratic argument in leading human beings toward the good., In the past quarter century, enormous philosophical attention has been paid to Plato's "Socratic" dialogues, as interpreters have sought to identify which dialogues are truly Socratic and interpret and defend the moral theories they find in those works. In spite of this intellectual energy, no consensus has emerged on the question of whether Socrates was a hedonist--whether he believed pleasure to be the good. In this study, George Rudebusch addresses this question and the textual puzzle from which it has arisen. In the Protagoras , Plato has Socrates appeal to hedonism in order to assert his characteristic identification of virtue and knowledge. While in the Gorgias , Socrates attributes hedonism to his opponent and argues against it in defense of his own view that doing injustice is worse than suffering it. From the Apology and Crito , it is clear that Socrates believes virtue to be the supreme good. Taken together, scholars have found these texts to be incoherent and seek to account for them either in terms of the development of Plato's thinking or by denying that one or more of these texts was meant to reflect Socrates' own ethical theory. Rudebusch argues instead that these texts do indeed fit together into a coherent moral theory as he attempts to locate Socrates' position on hedonism. He distinguishes Socrates' own hedonism from that which Socrates attacks elsewhere. Rudebusch also maintains that Socrates identifies pleasant activity with virtuous activity, describing Socrates' hedonism as one of activity, not sensation. This analysis allows for Socrates to find both virtue and pleasure to be the good, thus solving the textual puzzle and showing the power of Socratic argument in leading human beings toward the good. Tackling some of the most fundamental debates over Socratic ethics in Plato's earlier dialogues, Socrates, Pleasure, and Value will generate renewed discussion among specialists and provide excellent reading for courses in ancient philosophy as well as ethical theory., In the past quarter century, enormous philosophical attention has been paid to Plato's "Socratic" dialogues, as interpreters have sought to identify which dialogues are truly Socratic and interpret and defend the moral theories they find in those works. In spite of this intellectual energy, no consensus has emerged on the question of whether Socrates was a hedonist--whether he believed pleasure to be the good. In this study, George Rudebusch addresses this question and the textual puzzle from which it has arisen. In the Protagoras, Plato has Socrates appeal to hedonism in order to assert his characteristic identification of virtue and knowledge. While in the Gorgias, Socrates attributes hedonism to his opponent and argues against it in defense of his own view that doing injustice is worse than suffering it. From the Apology and Crito, it is clear that Socrates believes virtue to be the supreme good. Taken together, scholars have found these texts to be incoherent and seek to account for them either in terms of the development of Plato's thinking or by denying that one or more of these texts was meant to reflect Socrates' own ethical theory. Rudebusch argues instead that these texts do indeed fit together into a coherent moral theory as he attempts to locate Socrates' position on hedonism. He distinguishes Socrates' own hedonism from that which Socrates attacks elsewhere. Rudebusch also maintains that Socrates identifies pleasant activity with virtuous activity, describing Socrates' hedonism as one of activity, not sensation. This analysis allows for Socrates to find both virtue and pleasure to be the good, thus solving the textual puzzle and showing the power of Socratic argument in leading human beings toward the good. Tackling some of the most fundamental debates over Socratic ethics in Plato's earlier dialogues, Socrates, Pleasure, and Value will generate renewed discussion among specialists and provide excellent reading for courses in ancient philosophy as well as ethical theory.
LC Classification Number
B318

Descripción del artículo del vendedor

Información de vendedor profesional

Certifico que todas mis actividades de venta cumplirán todas las leyes y reglamentos de la UE.
Acerca de este vendedor

Queen City Books

100% de votos positivos32 mil artículos vendidos

Se unió el nov 2014
Registrado como vendedor profesional
Visitar tiendaContactar

Valoraciones detalladas sobre el vendedor

Promedio durante los últimos 12 meses
Descripción precisa
5.0
Gastos de envío razonables
4.9
Rapidez de envío
5.0
Comunicación
5.0

Votos de vendedor (13.414)

Todas las valoraciones
Positivas
Neutras
Negativas
  • p***o (2511)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.
    Últimos 6 meses
    Compra verificada
    Item received was not quite what was described by seller in listing. I contacted seller to request a 50% refund. Within hours, kind seller responded with a complete refund which did not entail my returning the item. Excellent customer service and the item was securely packaged and quickly sent. I would not hesitate to purchase from this seller in future.
  • 5***r (104)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.
    Últimos 6 meses
    Compra verificada
    Awesome! Seller dropped item off the day after purchase and it arrived in 3 days time! Item came well protected, it was as stated, very good condition, and was a great value! Consistently great seller and will definitely will be back to buy, thank you!
  • t***0 (52)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.
    Últimos 6 meses
    Compra verificada
    Item was exactly as described, and in excellent condition considering its age and initial purpose as an automotive shop manual. Vendor's shipping was fast and very reasonably priced, and the packaging was just as described - excellent for printed material. Easily a Five-Star transaction all around! Very pleased, and would do business with this vendor again without hesitation.