¿Quieres vender uno?
Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
USD18,00
Aproximadamente15,37 EUR
o Mejor oferta
Estado:
Nuevo
Libro nuevo, sin usar y sin leer, que está en perfecto estado; incluye todas las páginas sin defectos. Consulta el anuncio del vendedor para obtener más información.
- ¡Cómpralo ya!Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Envío:
Gratis USPS Media MailTM.
Ubicado en: New York, New York, Estados Unidos
Entrega:
Entrega prevista entre el sáb. 11 oct. y el sáb. 18 oct. a 94104
Devoluciones:
No se aceptan devoluciones.
Pagos:
Compra con confianza
El vendedor asume toda la responsabilidad de este anuncio.
N.º de artículo de eBay:226449832272
Características del artículo
- Estado
- Release Year
- 2024
- ISBN
- 9781668021538
Acerca de este producto
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Simon & Schuster
ISBN-10
1668021536
ISBN-13
9781668021538
eBay Product ID (ePID)
7063423361
Product Key Features
Book Title
Reading the Constitution : Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
Number of Pages
368 Pages
Language
English
Topic
American Government / Judicial Branch, Constitutional, Constitutions, United States / 21st Century
Publication Year
2024
Genre
Law, Political Science, History
Format
Hardcover
Dimensions
Item Height
1.1 in
Item Weight
18.8 Oz
Item Length
9.2 in
Item Width
6.1 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Trade
LCCN
2023-288455
Dewey Edition
23
Reviews
A rocket from a Supreme Court justice who served 28 years on the Court. Justice Breyer shows how the current Supreme Court's alleged textualism and originalism are unsound. His book is a judicial arms-control agreement advocating moderation and a path to what he calls 'workable democracy.' You will not read a more important legal work this election year.
Dewey Decimal
342.7302
Synopsis
A provocative, brilliant analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution. "You will not read a more important legal work this election year." --Bob Woodward, Washington Post reporter and author of fifteen #1 New York Times bestselling books "A dissent for the ages." -- The Washington Post "Breyer's candor about the state of the court is refreshing and much needed." -- The Boston Globe The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer's philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall's exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations. Most important in interpreting law, says Breyer, is to understand the purposes of statutes as well as the consequences of deciding a case one way or another. He illustrates these principles by examining some of the most important cases in the nation's history, among them the Dobbs and Bruen decisions from 2022 that he argues were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results., A provocative, brilliant analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution . "You will not read a more important legal work this election year." --Bob Woodward, Washington Post reporter and author of fifteen #1 New York Times bestselling books "A dissent for the ages." -- The Washington Post "Breyer's candor about the state of the court is refreshing and much needed." -- The Boston Globe The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer's philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall's exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations. Most important in interpreting law, says Breyer, is to understand the purposes of statutes as well as the consequences of deciding a case one way or another. He illustrates these principles by examining some of the most important cases in the nation's history, among them the Dobbs and Bruen decisions from 2022 that he argues were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results.
LC Classification Number
KF4550.B728 2024
Descripción del artículo del vendedor
Acerca de este vendedor
postalex212
87,5% de votos positivos•63 artículos vendidos
Registrado como vendedor particularPor tanto, no se aplican los derechos de los consumidores derivados de las leyes de protección de los consumidores de la UE. La Garantía al cliente de eBay sigue aplicando a la mayoría de compras. Más informaciónMás información
Votos de vendedor (19)
- e***p (139)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.Mes pasadoCompra verificadaArrived quickly and in time before my trip! Thank you!
- t***1 (179)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.Últimos 6 mesesCompra verificadaSeller never mailed the item.
- b***r (1119)- Votos emitidos por el comprador.Último añoCompra verificadaWell packaged. Many thanks.The Century in Times Square by New York Times Staff (1999, Hardcover) (#224795874185)